Alternate aerodrome planning is one of the most number-heavy topics on the INRAT. There are specific weather thresholds for when you need an alternate, specific minimums for what qualifies as one, and fuel requirements on top of that. Get the numbers wrong on the exam and you'll lose marks even if your reasoning is right.

When do you need an alternate?

You need a filed alternate when the forecast weather at your destination is below certain thresholds for the period from one hour before to one hour after your estimated time of arrival.

Approach at destinationAlternate required when forecast below
Precision approach (ILS, LPV)Ceiling 1,500 ft AGL / Visibility 3 SM
Non-precision approachCeiling 2,000 ft AGL / Visibility 3 SM
No instrument approach availableAlternate always required

Both the ceiling and visibility must be at or above the threshold to avoid needing an alternate. If either is below — even if the other is fine — you file an alternate.

Remember: These thresholds are based on the forecast weather, not the current conditions. You're planning before departure. Even if it's clear right now, if the TAF shows a ceiling of 1,200 feet at your ETA and you have only a non-precision approach, you need an alternate.

What qualifies as an alternate?

Not every airport can serve as your alternate. The forecast weather at the alternate must meet its own set of minimums at your ETA:

Approach at alternateForecast weather required
Precision approach (ILS)Ceiling 600 ft / Visibility 2 SM
Non-precision approachCeiling 800 ft / Visibility 2 SM
No instrument approachCeiling 1,000 ft / Visibility 3 SM

These are lower than the destination thresholds because by the time you divert, you're already airborne and committed. The alternate just needs to be usable — not comfortable.

Satellite-based approaches as alternates

RNAV (GNSS) approaches can be used to qualify an alternate, but with a restriction: you cannot use the same navigation system for both your destination approach and your alternate if a failure of that system would leave you without any approach at either location. In practice, if your destination is RNAV and your alternate is also RNAV-only, you need to verify that a GPS outage wouldn't strand you at both simultaneously.

Aerodromes served only by GFA

Some remote Canadian aerodromes don't have TAF forecasts — they're covered only by the Graphic Area Forecast (GFA). An aerodrome served only by GFA can qualify as an alternate, but the forecast weather must meet the standard alternate minimums. The exam will sometimes specify a GFA-only aerodrome and ask whether it qualifies — the answer depends on the forecast, not the forecast source.

Alternate minima in Canada

The term alternate minima refers to the minimum forecast weather conditions that an aerodrome must have to qualify as a legal IFR alternate. In Canada, these are set out in the CARs and depend on the type of approach available at the alternate aerodrome.

The alternate minima for Canadian IFR flight planning are:

Approach type at alternateCeilingVisibility
Precision approach (ILS, LPV)600 ft AGL2 SM
Non-precision approach800 ft AGL2 SM
No instrument approach1,000 ft AGL3 SM

These alternate minima are lower than your destination thresholds because at the point of diversion you're already airborne — the alternate just needs to be workable. The exam uses the phrase "alternate minima" directly in some questions, so it's worth knowing the term, not just the numbers.

Canada vs. US: Alternate minima in Canada differ from FAA rules. The US uses a 600-2 / 800-2 system too, but the trigger conditions for needing an alternate (the 1-2-3 rule) work differently. If you've studied US material, double-check the Canadian numbers before your exam.

Enroute alternates

For long over-water or remote flights, Transport Canada may require an enroute alternate — an aerodrome you could divert to mid-flight if a problem develops before you reach your destination. Enroute alternates are separate from your filed destination alternate and are typically required when flying beyond gliding distance of land or in ETOPS operations. The INRAT doesn't test enroute alternates deeply, but knowing the concept distinguishes it from a standard filed alternate.

Fuel requirements with an alternate

When an alternate is required, your fuel planning must include: fuel to destination, plus fuel to the alternate, plus 45 minutes reserve at normal cruise (for piston aircraft). Turbine aircraft have different reserve requirements. The INRAT will occasionally give you a fuel scenario and ask whether the planned fuel load is sufficient — knowing the structure of the requirement matters as much as the numbers. The fuel rules fit into a larger picture of what goes on an IFR flight plan in Canada, including when one is required, required fields, and how to close it after landing.

Quick reference — all the numbers

SituationCeilingVisibility
Destination — precision approach (need alternate if below)1,500 ft AGL3 SM
Destination — non-precision approach (need alternate if below)2,000 ft AGL3 SM
Alternate minima — precision approach600 ft AGL2 SM
Alternate minima — non-precision approach800 ft AGL2 SM
Alternate minima — no instrument approach1,000 ft AGL3 SM
Exam tip: The four numbers to have cold: 1,500/3 (destination precision), 2,000/3 (destination non-precision), 600/2 (alternate precision), 800/2 (alternate non-precision). Questions in this category almost always require at least one of these.

Practice flight planning questions

513 INRAT questions including full Flight Planning coverage. Timed exam simulator, AI explanations for every answer.

Try Free →
Ash H
Flight Instructor  ·  Transport Canada

Ash H has been a flight instructor for 12 years — New Brunswick, Toronto, Collingwood — and has helped hundreds of students prepare for Transport Canada exams. He built IFRTEST.ca because most IFR prep online is written for the FAA, not for this exam.

← All articles